(Tas @ Jul. 29 2007,03:20)
QUOTE
(Evil and Chaos @ Jul. 26 2007,08:14)
QUOTE
His proffered options for the way ahead last time were:
- Set up a fully seperate company the sell and promote Epic (And only Epic) in a similar manner to ForgeWorld.
- Let Forgeworld take over the rules & model development for the future.
I dont see how the first option ois possible given the copyright issues involved and GW's strict attitude towards copyright enforcement.
What is your opinion of how he is taking all of this? He pretty much was Specialist games, so it like watching his creations get shelved. I wouldnt be a happy chappy
Firstly, GW would licence the IP in perpetuity to the Epic company for a penny, or something similar.
Secondly, Jervis thinks they'll get back to the SG's in some form one day. He split them into two categories.
SG's that don't need ongoing support, just putting in order:
- Necromunda
- Inquisitor
- Battle of Five
- Blood Bowl
- Mordheim
SG's that do need ongoing support:
- Epic
- Warmaster
He reckoned BFG could be placed in either category.
I would not be surprised to see some of the 'don't need ongoing support' systems revisited by the core studio at some point to give them modern boxed sets (That's my own conjecture). The 'requires ongoing support' systems are a different matter.