Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

race balance
Chaos 8%  8%  [ 2 ]
Eldar 42%  42%  [ 10 ]
IG 25%  25%  [ 6 ]
Necrons 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
Orks 8%  8%  [ 2 ]
Space Marines 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
Tau 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
Tyranids 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 24

race balance

 Post subject: race balance
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:43 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:22 pm
Posts: 73
My league was having a discusion about what the (I don't want to say cheesy but...) most efficient army would be.

I was intreagued because it looked like everyone voted for the army that hurted them the most and not for an all-arround best army.

I think that there are armies that are more "versatlie" than others (like orks). ?And armies that base their tactics in as specific maneuver (like assault marines). ?

But tactics aside, ?which army would you say is the most efficient?
Which one is the easiest to win with or harder to fight against.

I didn't include the Titan lists. And the alternate (like speed freaks) lists should be concidered in the appropiate race (orks in this example). ?So, ?all chaos would be chaos and all orks would be orks.

More than flaming or trolling, ?I am looking to use this to help PLAYERS-TO-BE choose the army they want to start with.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: race balance
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 4:02 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
I don't think having in-development lists is really a good idea.  They have a tendency to mutate rapidly in unexpected directions.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: race balance
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 4:35 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:22 pm
Posts: 73
The reason I added them is because people like to play their same 40k army.

So,  If I dropped chaos (which I would say is going to be one of the high rankers in the poll) or Tau or bugs... I would leave the game out for many people.

But you are right and that's the reason I left the titan lists out.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: race balance
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:54 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
Eldar. Well this is no surprise... :p

From what I've heard, feral orks, speed freaks, and siege masters would be up there too had they been included...

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: race balance
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:19 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA
Quote (phindar @ 27 Feb. 2006 (15:35))
The reason I added them is because people like to play their same 40k army.

That explains Squats not being on the list. ?:p

I really wish GW would bring back Squats for 40k. Not because I play 40k, which I don't, but if they existed in 40k then GW might come out with new epic Squat minis.  :laugh:





_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net