Do the Oddboys in this list come with their standard Soopagun/Supa-Zzap weaponry, or do they have to buy them as upgrades from the Gargant Weapons? I don't much fancy paying 100 points for an Oddboy to get the same weapons they normally get for 50. Even if you get the normal weapons by default, I'm not sure why you'd switch them for other Gargant weapons at that price. It might be simpler to leave them with their usual choice of weapon - leave the Gargant weapons for the Gargants. (Otherwise I suspect you'd see a lot of Oddboys lugging around Gutbuster Kannons.)

Can I suggest that the Mega-Choppa and Ripper Fist should probably be 0-1? (Possibly even 0-1 choice of melee weapon, rather than one of each.) While it would be hilarious to see a three-armed chainsaw-Gargant going hog-wild on some other hapless Titan, it's very out of keeping with normal expectations.

I'm not sure how I feel about Dreads, Kans, buggies etc being able to be transported - that's a weird image. Regardless, there are a few typos in the current Transporta description. For clarity and consistency, the current version should probably read something like:

"The unit gains Transport. It may transport a number of infantry units, light vehicle units, Dreadnought units and Killa Kan units equal to twice its starting DC, plus a number of Grotz equal to its starting DC. Light vehicles and Dreadnoughts count as two units each."

Though I would personally reduce that to just foot infantry:

"The unit gains Transport. It may transport a number of infantry units without Jump Packs or Mounted equal to twice its starting DC, plus a number of Grotz equal to its starting DC."

The pricing on weaponry doesn't seem quite right - a standard Great Gargant (Ghaz list) can get two Twin Soopaguns + Soopagun for 850 points, but the same loadout in this list costs 900 points.

No Nobz or other sources of Leader in the entire list? That's a bit hairy. Preserving the old Warband's option for 0-1 Nobz would be nice. Alternatively, adding a Leader bonus to the effect of Dave's Gork/Mork head could be a neat thematic alternative? No Nobz in the list, but the Boyz are bolstered by the Gargants instead.

Well, this is an ork list which should cater to the weird and funky builds. As long as it's not a broken OOP build I don't mind allowing it at all. I'm rather hoping that people will field Chainsaw Gargants now and then!

I don't think transporting LV:s is that bad or OOP so i'll keep it in there for now.

I actually think it's the Great Gargant that costs a little bit to much. Originally i was thinking about pricing it around 650-675 "naked". I was just afraid that it would be to low. Maybe we can start with 675 and see how that goes.

Can I suggest that the Mega-Choppa and Ripper Fist should probably be 0-1? (Possibly even 0-1 choice of melee weapon, rather than one of each.) While it would be hilarious to see a three-armed chainsaw-Gargant going hog-wild on some other hapless Titan, it's very out of keeping with normal expectations.

Disgorging up to 18 Killa Kanz from a Great Gargant might well give your opponent a heart attack!

Does 'naked' mean with no weapons at all? Great Gargants (Ghaz version) have a Soopagun (50 pts), two Twin Soopaguns (75pts each), and two Big Gunz (not available as an upgrade yet), as well at the Gaze of Mork which I assume is standard on all Gargant loadouts. That's at least 200 points off the 850-point price tag, plus the cost of the Big Gunz if they don't come standard. You'd need to start at 650 and go down from there.
Sorry, haven't finished the statlines for every unit yet, so i haven't posted all the info. The Great Gargants will have the Gaze of Mork and the 2xBig Gunz as standard loadout (Gargants will have only Gaze of Mork) included in their "naked" cost. I also calculated it to 650 at first but got worried that it might be too low really. Gargants will stay at 500 for now.
(I have a suspicion that Great Gargants are priced so high because it's a kludgy way of preventing them being taken alongside Landas at 3000 points - since that's not a problem in this list, and the Gargants are meant to be the central feature, I think they could easily afford to drop a bit further. I'd start the Gargant at 450 and the Great Gargant at 600 - weapons and upgrades will easily make up the difference. I'd also drop the Mega-Gargant to 1000 or less.)

Hi, thank you for your effort with this list!

Some time ago I tried to patch together my own list just for fun. It didn't get far and was never intended to be anything official, but maybe you can get some inspirations from it. What's missing in the pdf are the unit stats, but they should be clear except for:
Mekboy Stompa: was supposed to replace the Supa Stompa as that one is so similar to the Gargants, and I wanted more variety in speed and AA. Its stats are the same as a Supa Stompa, just with a speed of 20cm and a weapon loadout of 2 weedy gunz, 2 Flakk guns, Gaze of Mork/Gork. So it is loosely based on a mix of a Supa Stompa, the old Kustom Gargant, a speed upgrade, and downgraded weapons to provide a cheaper "little-Gargant".
Iron Squig was supposed to be a nerfed Krawler, but I never got around to designing the rules. Nerfed, because IMO it had too many DC and was too safe as a transport.

I think the Killa Kan formation with scout is a nice theme to gain more cheap formations on the ground, competing with Fighta Bommas.

The idea behind the Mekboy KoS was to provide some speedy elements while keeping the mek theme.

I think E&C mentioned once he planned to change the Bomma to 150 pts. Are you working off the same stats? Might the point drop also be appropriate here?

I cannot find any limitation on slots depending on your gargant choices, as in the old list. I think such a rule is definitely needed in a WE heavy army to prevent list with a few strong WEs and a lot of the cheapest formation for activations. With such a rule you probably also do not need to add a limit to Fighta Bommas, as the limited number of formation slots available will force you to decide between cheap air units and important ground troops.

I once calculated that Stompas - compared to our other walkers - would best fit in the 60-65 pts price range. +50pts for an additional Stompa might be too cheap, they are definitely better than two Killa Kans for the same price.

Mega Gargants and Great Gargants will allow 4 non-Gargant choices each, Hagrgants will allow 3 non-Gargant choices each. Drop Rocks, Bommer, Fighta-Bombas and Space craft are restricted by the usual 1/3 points rule.

But that's not what this restriction achieves, is it?

You don't want to have two big War Engines and still have as many activations as other lists - fair enough, I can see how that might be a balance problem. However this list, with the restriction included, allows you to have two Gargants and up to eight other activations - that's easily as many as most competitive lists. Isn't that exactly the problem you were trying to avoid?

What this restriction does not allow you to do is have only one Gargant. That's the army that's forced to let the opponent out-activate it, because it can have a maximum of five activations.

Nobz missing is a Typo. Thanks for spotting that.
Yes, i really like the Head of Gork/Mork idea. Maybe put that in as a Kustom Upgrade?

An army lead and organised by Big Meks and
mekaniaks is often viewed of as too soft or even, that
most distinct Orkish insult, too brainy. So most Nobz,
and even most Boyz, tend to avoid associating with Big
Meks and Mekboys in general. Occasionally the
members of a warband or will find themselves
temporarily accompanying the Bigmob until they can
find more acceptable, Orky, compatriots to fight with.
Or at least someone who isn't always taking apart all
their weapons just before a good punch-up starts! As
such, most formations in the Bigmob do not have Nobz
available to them and even warbands that do have
Nobz have a very limited number of them.

Well, if you want to build an army around a single gargant or Great Gargant, theres always the Warhorde to use...
This list is supposed to focus on the gargants and allowing people to field up to 5 in a list is something that does just that.

I'm not trying to belittle (is that the expression?) your opinions or ideas (you have suggested lots of great ideas so far!), i just don't really see the point of fielding 1 gargant in a list that is supposed to make you field several.