Tactical Command http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/ |
|
Updated Minervan List http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=19105 |
Page 3 of 3 |
Author: | GlynG [ Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Updated Minervan List |
That Heavy Bolter is mounted on one side of the main gun, 1mm or so away from it. Google image search 'forge world Stormsword'. |
Author: | carlisimo109 [ Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Updated Minervan List |
Oh, you're right; and it's a pretty obvious spot. I was going through my friend's Imperial Armour book and it didn't show that angle. Thanks! Now to figure out what to make Salamanders out of. |
Author: | Geep [ Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Updated Minervan List |
I've been looking at the 2014 NetEA Army List Compendium, and I'm wondering if I'm missing some details on the various tank types. A Leman Russ Conqueror is the same points as a Leman Russ Exterminator, but the Exterminator is unquestionably better (an extra 2xAP5+ from the sponsons, and AP4+ rather than 5+ for the main gun). The Conqueror also looks very weak compared to a regular Russ, losing the heavy bolter sponsors, 30cm main gun range and dropping from 4+/4+ to 5+/5+ on the main gun for only 10pts less. Are any of these stats or points likely to change? I'm assembling a heap of tanks now, converting them into different varieties, but am a little disappointed that there is no reason at all to take Conquerors right now. |
Author: | The_Real_Chris [ Fri Nov 07, 2014 4:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Updated Minervan List |
carlisimo109 wrote: Now to figure out what to make Salamanders out of. Always these guys, are on ebay as well. viewtopic.php?f=7&t=28437 |
Author: | jimmyzimms [ Fri Nov 07, 2014 4:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Updated Minervan List |
Geep wrote: I've been looking at the 2014 NetEA Army List Compendium, and I'm wondering if I'm missing some details on the various tank types. A Leman Russ Conqueror is the same points as a Leman Russ Exterminator, but the Exterminator is unquestionably better (an extra 2xAP5+ from the sponsons, and AP4+ rather than 5+ for the main gun). The Conqueror also looks very weak compared to a regular Russ, losing the heavy bolter sponsors, 30cm main gun range and dropping from 4+/4+ to 5+/5+ on the main gun for only 10pts less. Are any of these stats or points likely to change? I'm assembling a heap of tanks now, converting them into different varieties, but am a little disappointed that there is no reason at all to take Conquerors right now. Conquerors trade weapons for speed (20cm v 30cm). You don't see them in line companies very much but they're great high speed blitz raiders in a 6 tank squadron (or two of them easily in 3k). I use them to great effect as a harassment force. |
Author: | Geep [ Fri Nov 07, 2014 5:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Updated Minervan List |
Quote: Conquerors trade weapons for speed (20cm v 30cm). You don't see them in line companies very much but they're great high speed blitz raiders in a 6 tank squadron (or two of them easily in 3k). I use them to great effect as a harassment force. Thanks- I missed the extra movement. Unfortunate that they're not an option for Steel Legion armies- 3 could be added to a Mech Infantry company to boost the toughness but keep speed. 6 is a harder number of models to come by. |
Author: | Drang [ Fri Apr 29, 2022 12:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Updated Minervan List |
Controversial take: Leman Russ Destroyers and Hellhounds should be deployed as separate squadrons. |
Author: | Dave [ Fri Apr 29, 2022 12:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Updated Minervan List |
They can be, as of January. |
Author: | Drang [ Sat Apr 30, 2022 12:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Updated Minervan List |
Dave wrote: They can be, as of January. Huh, let that teach me to not check the right website |
Page 3 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |