Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Question regarding assault

 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 2:24 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:25 pm
Posts: 9539
Location: Worcester, MA
I would say yes to at least one LOS, it seems silly to be able to engage a formation on the other side of an impenetrable barrier that's less than 15cm in length.

_________________
Dave

Blog

NetEA Tournament Pack Website

Squats 2019-10-17


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:11 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
That is odd.  I assumed that the "stall" rules in the Errata for 1.12 would cover that, but it's also based on range.

RAW, I'd have to say the attack goes forward.  I'd have serious qualms about anyone who tried that.  If I were working as a judge at a tourney, I would recommend they find a non-cheesy action to take instead but it appears legal.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:10 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 948
Location: Nottingham, UK
That is bizarre.

I agree that it wouldn't make sense for an assault to take place if no units had LOS to each other, it would just be plain silly.  If there is a huge building between the unit in question, or an area of thick woodland, for example, there is just no way I would even dream about claiming to be in a position to be able to assault.

_________________
Soñando con una playa donde brilla el sol, un arco iris ilumina el cielo, y el mar espejea iridescentemente.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:19 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 8711
Location: Leipzig, Germany, Europe, Sol III, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe
Well lets see.
You are behind some obstacle which blocks LOS. But you hear lots of noise which could be only a BIG enemy horde which approaches you.
Well it is possible that you crap youselfe in the pants and run for your life.

So on the board it seems odd but from a real-life standpoint it looks sensible.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:13 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Looks like a bit of an oversight... and it's actually quite surprising it's never come up!  *laugh*

It would even allow supporting fire from nearby formations...   :O

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:29 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:10 pm
Posts: 2642
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Quote: (nealhunt @ 03 Oct. 2008, 07:11 )

That is odd.

Very odd since the rules at one point specifically did require LOS as we discussed it based on some games we had here locally and the Assault rules were amended based on that.

Not sure how/when it got removed.

_________________
Guns don't break formations. Blast Markers break formations.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:07 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 948
Location: Nottingham, UK
Quote: (BlackLegion @ 03 Oct. 2008, 21:19 )

Well lets see.
You are behind some obstacle which blocks LOS. But you hear lots of noise which could be only a BIG enemy horde which approaches you.
Well it is possible that you crap youselfe in the pants and run for your life.

So on the board it seems odd but from a real-life standpoint it looks sensible.

Some troops make little or no noise as they approach the enemy though, e.g. Eldar Rangers, so I'm not sure that it's always the case from a 'real life' perspective either.  Obviously, you would hear a horde of Orks from miles away, but more stealthy troops could easily sneak up on you.

_________________
Soñando con una playa donde brilla el sol, un arco iris ilumina el cielo, y el mar espejea iridescentemente.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 2:17 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Well, support fire requires a "line of fire" to be usable, even if within 15cm of a target unit...

That seems to be glaringly missing from the initial assault rules, and I think it should be included.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:16 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:39 pm
Posts: 1974
Location: South Yorkshire
Quote: (Chroma @ 03 Oct. 2008, 22:13 )

It would even allow supporting fire from nearby formations...   :O

Supporting formations can only target units that are "directly involved" in the assault.
Under the conditions of the stated assault none of the defenders would actually be "directly involved" due to LOS.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:26 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (dptdexys @ 04 Oct. 2008, 20:16 )

Under the conditions of the stated assault none of the defenders would actually be "directly involved" due to LOS.

My oh my... it gets pretty convoluted there, now that I've re-read it in the errata:

Support fire wouldn't be allowed against the enemy, attacker or defender, as *none* of them are "directly involved" in the assault, since none are actually "in a position to attack", because that requires being in base contact or being within 15cm *AND* having a line of fire to an enemy unit, despite being "directly engaged", within 15cm of a defending unit after charge and counter-charge moves have been completed.

So, no attacks are made, and assault resolution is just based on other modifiers...  I *really* don't think that was intended, and the "line of fire" condition should probably be included in standard assaults as it is in support fire.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:07 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 948
Location: Nottingham, UK
Quote: (Chroma @ 04 Oct. 2008, 21:26 )

Quote: (dptdexys @ 04 Oct. 2008, 20:16 )

Under the conditions of the stated assault none of the defenders would actually be "directly involved" due to LOS.

My oh my... it gets pretty convoluted there, now that I've re-read it in the errata:

Support fire wouldn't be allowed against the enemy, attacker or defender, as *none* of them are "directly involved" in the assault, since none are actually "in a position to attack", because that requires being in base contact or being within 15cm *AND* having a line of fire to an enemy unit, despite being "directly engaged", within 15cm of a defending unit after charge and counter-charge moves have been completed.

So, no attacks are made, and assault resolution is just based on other modifiers...  I *really* don't think that was intended, and the "line of fire" condition should probably be included in standard assaults as it is in support fire.

I don't believe that this can have been the intention either, so adding the condition 'line of fire' seems the logical thing to do to me, although it should, in my view, be pretty clear that LOS is going to be needed for an assault to take place without it being explicitly stated in the rules.

While we're on this particular subject, and because my memory is failing me just at this moment in time, when you have formations which are actually in an assault, do units in base contact block the line of fire to other members of their formation who are using their FF value?  I do know the answer to this, I'm sure, but I just can't recall it at the moment.  Could somebody jog my memory?

_________________
Soñando con una playa donde brilla el sol, un arco iris ilumina el cielo, y el mar espejea iridescentemente.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Question regarding assault
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:08 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (Irisado @ 04 Oct. 2008, 23:07 )

While we're on this particular subject, and because my memory is failing me just at this moment in time, when you have formations which are actually in an assault, do units in base contact block the line of fire to other members of their formation who are using their FF value?  I do know the answer to this, I'm sure, but I just can't recall it at the moment.  Could somebody jog my memory?

Non-war engine models never block line of sight.

And, outside of war engines again, all hits in an assault are "pooled", and then applied front to back, starting with units in base contact.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net