 
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
Sam Hainn SC |
|
Markconz
|
Post subject: Sam Hainn SC  Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:21 am |
|
| Purestrain |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
|
|
Shouldn't Sam Hainn have a SC entry for their list? Should be on a bike or vyper I guess.
Is there going to be a new SH list out anytime soon?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
code_ronin
|
Post subject: Sam Hainn SC Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:20 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:51 pm
Posts: 127
|
|
This was mentioned in another S-H thread and I believe the reason stated that there would be no SC is because of the chaotic nature of the S-H; that no Supreme Commander would be able to rise above all of the bickering amongst the tribes.
From a game perspective, I think the argument was that 1+ initiative, Farsight, attached Farseers, and Supreme Commander all in one formation was too much.
_________________
Have keyboard, will travel.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
code_ronin
|
Post subject: Sam Hainn SC Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:30 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:51 pm
Posts: 127
|
|
I just finished a game with the Saim-Hann and twice I failed to activate on a 2+ attempting to retain initiative (hey, it happens - obviously). So, 1-in-6 your plan goes to hell fast. Having a Supreme Commander to turn that into 1-in-36 would be too much, I think, unless the Wild Riders' initiative is raised to 2+ (which I would not like to see, but think is going to happen).
Dale
_________________
Have keyboard, will travel.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
