Alright, 11 people have weighed in on the AV/1DC/2DC and we have:
AV - Apoc
1DC - Markco, Glyn
2DC - captPiett, DaR, DS, BL, Armiger84, mordoten, Borka, Jaggedtoothgrin
Since AV is out, Apoc said he'd be in favor of 2DC, that makes it 2-9 in favor of 2DC.
GlynG wrote:
It goes against the simple abstract approach epic should take and honestly would put me off wanting to play with the army.
Not sure what I can do for you on this. I'd like to see some games from you and Markco, but I can't cater to a minority stance that's purely opinion.
--------
There's not much dissent on the Chainsword being MW instead of TK, taking the middle ground on the battlecannon, stubbers and bolters rolled in to FF, and the shock lance. We do have a little bit of debate on the the CC value. So what do people prefer:
2@5+ MWCode:
Knight Paladin WE 25cm 5+ 5+ 5+
Battle Cannon 75cm AP4+/AT4+
Chainsword (bc) MW
Shock Lance (15cm) EA(+1), FS
DC2, Knight Shield, Reinforced Armour, Walker. The Shock Lance may only be used if the unit's formation carried out an engage action.
2@5+ with a EA(+1), MWCode:
Knight Paladin WE 25cm 5+ 5+ 5+
Battle Cannon 75cm AP4+/AT4+
Chainsword (bc) EA(+1), MW
Shock Lance (15cm) EA(+1), FS
DC2, Knight Shield, Reinforced Armour, Walker. The Shock Lance may only be used if the unit's formation carried out an engage action.
2@4+ with a EA(+1), MWCode:
Knight Paladin WE 25cm 5+ 4+ 5+
Battle Cannon 75cm AP4+/AT4+
Chainsword (bc) EA(+1), MW
Shock Lance (15cm) EA(+1), FS
DC2, Knight Shield, Reinforced Armour, Walker. The Shock Lance may only be used if the unit's formation carried out an engage action.