Interesting how quickly the discussion turns to "try the EUK list," which is probably some of the least productive advice on this board. I know that the NetEA tyranid list was much more thoroughly tested than the DKoK one, and having faced both lists I can say that I share your (dreykeo's) wonderment at DKoK's lack of weaknesses. I think these are currently being addressed by Matt-Shadowlord's revisions.
More pertinent question for you, however, is how you constructed and used your 'nid army. With tunnelers, genestealers, lictors, and harridans, you have a potential combination of garrison, speed, and deep strike. Dactylis and biovores also give you a lot of disrupt indirect. Since you are almost always going to lose strategy, the trick is to give your opponent more crises than he can handle (at least 3 potential engagements on turn 2 for example). Even if he wins strategy and retains, that still leaves one or more of his important formations vulnerable. If he stays castled up, more than likely you can box him in and he has to chew through a sea of 'nids just to get on your side of the board. It's always going to be bloody for the 'nids, and don't count on the dom surviving very long if there's deathstrikes on the board.
Given the way the list is now, I don't think krieg is a balanced opponent for them.
_________________ Let us playtest like the Greeks of old... You know the ones I mean
|