Tiny-Tim wrote:
Realistically the only way to bring the cost of the Leviathan down is to tone it down as at 375pts it is a very good war engine. However if it is moved back in to the WE section it loses out to its more expensive cousins..
A slightly less controversial request, would it be possible to have the Leviathan available as a transport in the core section and stand alone in the WE section in the next update? It might be sub optimal compared to the colossus, land train etc but would then be possible to have one at less than 550-675pts. Certainly I'd happily take one and I think other Squat players who just like the model would too.
and like you said, it could then be taken as a transport in larger games for Squat players who want as many cool war engine models as possible.
Tiny-Tim wrote:
All valid points, I would sat though that we adding bikers to the core of the main list adds a further reason not to take Warriors and so would not look to do that to this list.
Thunderfires I am thinking should be treated more like the IG static artillery and given the chance to either have emplacements or a transport vehicle - thinking here of Rhinos with a reduced movement when towing.
I think rhinos towing would be the best option for this thunderfires, for mobility and resistance to being broken, just didn't think it was on the cards as I remember Mosc really wasn't keen on the idea for old background reasons. But it's tried and tested. And we want to get this list approved, right?
Bikes could feature in a supplementary list, (though I'm sure I'll see them taken by Steve soon!)
Are there future Squat lists planned where bikes as core might make a good fit?
Just generally, do people also think a slight reduction in the price of warriors(say 275 even) might make this a more attractive unit?